We've just released a new feature: Text Annotation & Highlight - Add notes and highlights to articles! Login required.

Biochemical Test of Providencia stuartii

The biochemical test of Providencia stuartii refers to the group of laboratory tests that are used to identify this bacterium on the basis of its metabolic and enzymatic activities. It is a Gram-negative rod shaped facultative anaerobic organism belonging to the family Morganellaceae. In clinical microbiology these tests is carried out to differentiate Providencia stuartii from other members of Enterobacteriaceae like Proteus, Morganella, Escherichia and Klebsiella. Identification is mainly based on carbohydrate fermentation pattern enzyme production and decarboxylation reactions.

Providencia stuartii shows a characteristic positive reaction for Phenylalanine Deaminase (TDA) test. This is the major biochemical feature of members of tribe Proteeae. In this test phenylalanine is deaminated and after addition of ferric chloride a reddish brown colour is produced. This reaction helps in immediate differentiation from non-Proteeae organisms. The organism is indole positive methyl red positive Voges-Proskauer negative and citrate positive (though citrate reaction may be variable in few strains). Hydrogen sulphide (H₂S) production is absent which helps in separating it from Proteus species.

In carbohydrate fermentation tests Providencia stuartii is a non-lactose fermenter and does not produce acid from lactose. It is negative for mannitol and adonitol fermentation which is useful in differentiating it from Providencia rettgeri. It ferments trehalose and is usually positive for inositol fermentation. The organism is negative for lysine decarboxylase ornithine decarboxylase and arginine dihydrolase tests. Urease activity is generally negative or variable and is weaker when compared to Proteus. It is catalase positive and oxidase negative.

Thus biochemical testing of Providencia stuartii includes a combination of TDA test IMViC reactions carbohydrate fermentation pattern and decarboxylase tests. These reactions together form a distinct biochemical profile which is used for its accurate identification in routine diagnostic laboratories. Accurate identification is important because Providencia stuartii is commonly associated with catheter associated urinary tract infections and shows high level of intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance.

Biochemical Tests for Providencia stuartii and Results

The biochemical tests of Providencia stuartii are carried out to identify the organism based on its enzymatic activities and carbohydrate utilization pattern. These tests helps in differentiating it from other members of tribe Proteeae and Enterobacteriaceae.

Core Enzymatic and Physiological Tests

  • Phenylalanine Deaminase (TDA / PAD) – Positive
  • Oxidase – Negative
  • Catalase – Positive
  • Hydrogen sulphide (H₂S) production – Negative
  • Motility – Positive
  • Nitrate reduction – Positive
  • Gas from glucose – Negative
  • Growth in KCN – Positive
  • Gelatin hydrolysis – Negative
  • Urease – Variable (usually negative)

IMViC Tests

  • Indole test – Positive
  • Methyl red test – Positive
  • Voges–Proskauer test – Negative
  • Citrate utilization – Positive

Amino Acid Decarboxylation Tests

  • Arginine dihydrolase (ADH) – Negative
  • Lysine decarboxylase (LDC) – Negative
  • Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) – Negative

Carbohydrate Fermentation Tests

  • Glucose – Positive (acid only no gas)
  • Lactose – Negative
  • Mannitol – Negative
  • Inositol – Positive
  • Trehalose – Positive
  • Mannose – Positive
  • Galactose – Negative
  • Sucrose – Variable
  • Adonitol – Negative
  • Arabinose – Negative
  • Sorbitol – Negative
  • Maltose – Negative
  • Rhamnose – Negative
  • Salicin – Negative

Other Biochemical Tests

  • ONPG (β-galactosidase) – Negative
  • Malonate utilization – Negative
  • Esculin hydrolysis – Negative
  • Acetate utilization – Positive
  • Tartrate (Jordan’s) – Positive
  • DNase test – Negative
  • Lipase test – Negative

These biochemical reactions together forms a characteristic profile of Providencia stuartii which is useful in its laboratory identification and differentiation from other closely related organisms.

Summary Table of Biochemical Tests for Providencia stuartii

Biochemical TestResult
Phenylalanine Deaminase (TDA / PAD)Positive
OxidaseNegative
CatalasePositive
Hydrogen sulphide (H₂S) productionNegative
MotilityPositive
Nitrate reductionPositive
Gas from glucoseNegative
Growth in KCNPositive
Gelatin hydrolysisNegative
UreaseVariable (usually negative)
Indole testPositive
Methyl red testPositive
Voges–Proskauer testNegative
Citrate utilizationPositive
Arginine dihydrolase (ADH)Negative
Lysine decarboxylase (LDC)Negative
Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC)Negative
Glucose fermentationPositive (acid only no gas)
Lactose fermentationNegative
Mannitol fermentationNegative
Inositol fermentationPositive
Trehalose fermentationPositive
Mannose fermentationPositive
Galactose fermentationNegative
Sucrose fermentationVariable
Adonitol fermentationNegative
Arabinose fermentationNegative
Sorbitol fermentationNegative
Maltose fermentationNegative
Rhamnose fermentationNegative
Salicin fermentationNegative
ONPG testNegative
Malonate utilizationNegative
Esculin hydrolysisNegative
Acetate utilizationPositive
Tartrate (Jordan’s)Positive
DNase testNegative
Lipase testNegative

This table summarizes the important biochemical reactions of Providencia stuartii used for its identification in microbiology laboratory.

Reference
  1. Angmo, D., Nazir, S., & Fomda, B. A. (2017). Isolation of Providencia stuartii from clinical samples: An emerging drug resistant pathogen. Journal of Medical Sciences, 20(1), 38–40. https://doi.org/10.33883/jms.v20i1.309
  2. BacDive. (n.d.). Providencia stuartii 2896-68. The Bacterial Diversity Metadatabase. Retrieved from https://bacdive.dsmz.de/strain/5084
  3. bioMérieux. (2002). API 20 E: Identification system for Enterobacteriaceae and other non-fastidious Gram-negative rods [Instructions for Use].
  4. Exhaustive biochemical profile and clinical significance of Providencia stuartii [Manuscript excerpt]. (n.d.).
  5. Haley, E. (n.d.). P. stuartii. Pathnostics. Retrieved from https://pathnostics.com/p-stuartii/
  6. Kurmasheva, N., Vorobiev, V., Sharipova, M., Efremova, T., & Mardanova, A. (2018). The potential virulence factors of Providencia stuartii: Motility, adherence, and invasion. BioMed Research International, 2018, 3589135. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3589135
  7. LAB:4 Practical Pathogenic Bacteria. (n.d.). Bacterial diagnosis (Gram negative bacteria) 1- IMViC Test [Lecture notes].
  8. Liu, J., Wang, R., & Fang, M. (2020). Clinical and drug resistance characteristics of Providencia stuartii infections in 76 patients. Journal of International Medical Research, 48(10). https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520962296
  9. Malviya, M., Kale-Pradhan, P., Coyle, M., Giuliano, C., & Johnson, L. B. (2024). Clinical and drug resistance characteristics of Providencia infections. Microorganisms, 12(10), 2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102085
  10. O’Hara, C. M., Brenner, F. W., & Miller, J. M. (2000). Classification, identification, and clinical significance of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 13(4), 534–546. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.13.4.534-546.2000
  11. Providencia rettgeri. (2025, February 21). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Providencia_rettgeri
  12. Providencia stuartii. (2023, June 13). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Providencia_stuartii
  13. Shah, M. M., Odoyo, E., & Ichinose, Y. (2019). Epidemiology and pathogenesis of Providencia alcalifaciens infections. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 101(2), 290–293. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0376
  14. Stock, I., & Wiedemann, B. (1998). Natural antibiotic susceptibility of Providencia stuartii, P. rettgeri, P. alcalifaciens and P. rustigianii strains. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 47(7), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-47-7-629
  15. Sumpavapol, P. (2013). Differentiation of Providencia strains based on biochemical properties [Table]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Differentiation-of-Providencia-strains-based-on-biochemical-properties_tbl1_249996836
  16. Thaller, M. C., Berlutti, F., Pantanella, F., Pompei, R., & Satta, G. (1992). Modified MacConkey medium which allows simple and reliable identification of Providencia stuartii. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 30(8), 2054–2057. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.8.2054-2057.1992
  17. Tran, Q.-T., Mahendran, K. R., Hajjar, E., Ceccarelli, M., Davin-Regli, A., Winterhalter, M., Weingart, H., & Pagès, J.-M. (2010). Implication of porins in β-lactam resistance of Providencia stuartii. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 285(42), 32273–32281. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.143305
  18. Wie, S. H. (2015). Clinical significance of Providencia bacteremia or bacteriuria. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 30(2), 167–169. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2015.30.2.167

Start Asking Questions

Supports Markdown:**bold**, *italic*, ~~strikethrough~~, `code`

Ad Blocker Detected
We've detected that you're using an ad blocker. Some content may not display properly.
Why are you seeing this? Ad blockers can prevent certain content and features from loading correctly on our website.

To continue with the best experience: