Genetics 4 Views 1 Answers
Avatar for Sourav
SouravSeptember 10, 2024

A company claims that 50 percent get a basic audit, 30 percent get an enhanced audit, and 20 percent get a complete audit. The company tests this hypothesis using a random sample and finds χ2=0.771 with a corresponding p-value of 0.68. Assuming conditions for inference were met, which of the following is the correct interpretation of the p-value? A) There is a 68 percent chance of obtaining a chi-square value of at least 0.771. B) There is a 68 percent chance that the company’s claim is correct. C) If the null hypothesis were true, there would be a 68 percent chance that the company’s claim is correct. D) If the null hypothesis were true, there would be a 68 percent chance of obtaining a chi-square value of 0.771. E) If the null hypothesis were true, there would be a 68 percent chance of obtaining a chi-square value of at least 0.771.

A company claims that 50 percent get a basic audit, 30 percent get an enhanced audit, and 20 percent get a complete audit. The company tests this hypothesis using a random sample and finds χ2=0.771 with a corresponding p-value of 0.68. Assuming conditions for inference were met, which of the following is the correct interpretation of the p-value?
A) There is a 68 percent chance of obtaining a chi-square value of at least 0.771.
B) There is a 68 percent chance that the company’s claim is correct.
C) If the null hypothesis were true, there would be a 68 percent chance that the company’s claim is correct.
D) If the null hypothesis were true, there would be a 68 percent chance of obtaining a chi-square value of 0.771.
E) If the null hypothesis were true, there would be a 68 percent chance of obtaining a chi-square value of at least 0.771.

Sourav
SouravSeptember 10, 2024

Answer

Answer: E) If the null hypothesis were true, there would be a 68 percent chance of obtaining a chi-square value of at least 0.771.
Explanation: The p-value represents the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as or more extreme than the one observed, given that the null hypothesis is true.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add biologynotesonline.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×