We've just released a new feature: Text Annotation & Highlight - Add notes and highlights to articles! Login required.

Brucella – Habitat, Morphology, Pathogenesis, Treatment

What is Brucella?

Brucella is generally referred to as a group of small Gram-negative coccobacilli, And this genus is recognized as being the etiologic agent of chronic zoonotic infection’s, called brucellosis. In this case the organism’s are considered intracellular Pathogen’s that survive in the animals’ cells, which is necessary for their persistence, resulting in long-term disease that’s sometimes difficult to diagnose.

During this process, a wide variety of livestock species may be involved, and also the human exposure usually arise from unpasteurized milk or direct handling of infected tissue’s, which leads to transmission that is often underestimated in many regions.

Sometimes the bacteria is described as part of the Alphaproteobacteria Class, however—even this classification can be re-interpreted because of new genome comparison’s.

The genus Brucella shows a compact morphology; they’re usually 0.5–0.7 µm wide and around 0.6 to 1.5 µm long, forming short rods that appears non-motile, even though genes for flagella is present but not utilized effectively.

It is believed that these organism’s also have remarkable environmental endurance, surviving extreme temperature’s (12 °C to 48°C), humidity or high salt loads, causing long persistence in aborted fluid’s or soil etc. A characteristic feature is that their two chromosome’s are nearly equal in size, and the smaller chromosome is known to be associated with Pathogenicity, while the larger one is related to metabolism, giving rise to a balanced genomic architecture that sometimes confuse researchers.

Interestingly enough, the species lacks classical virulence factor’s, however, a Type IV secretion system is observed to be central, forming a special vacuole in the host cell, during which replication, conversion, and egress are orchestrated in a multi-phase cycle that can initiate chronic infection, producing host stress.

Historically, the genus was linked to Sir David Bruce who isolated what he called “Micrococcus melitensis”, And then the connection with Malta fever was eventually established, although the condition was previously mistaken with malaria in some soldiers. Later, Themistocles Zammit demonstrated that goat milk was a Key reservoir, which provides insights into the zoonotic nature, and also B. abortus (from cattle) was recorded by Bernhard Bang, which makes the literature full of earlier naming confusion. Of particular concern, these species were weaponized by several nation’s; B. suis was even the first to be developed in the U.S. program, leading to a reputation of being highly “weaponizable”.

Today the genus includes several host-linked species like bold B. melitensis, bold B. abortus, bold B. suis and bold B. canis, and these organism’s are often treated as having host preferences but they may cross-infect, producing significant economic loss and infertility in the animals’ herds. At the end of the chain, human cases emerge because contaminated milk or aerosols are encountered, and this still represent a major global health burden.

Scientific classification of Brucella

Domain:Bacteria
Phylum:Pseudomonadota
Class:Alphaproteobacteria
Order:Hyphomicrobiales
Family:Brucellaceae
Genus:Brucella
Meyer and Shaw 1920 (Approved Lists 1980)

Characteristics of Brucella

  • Brucella is a Gram-negative genus of small coccobacilli that’s commonly linked to zoonotic brucellosis, and also is considered a global Health threat, which leads to severe infection’s in many host’s.
  • It belong’s to the Phylum Pseudomonadota, and the Alphaproteobacteria Class, although phylogenetic evidence suggest an Ochrobactrum-like ancestor evolved in to the modern forms.
  • The organism’s are tiny (0.5–0.7 µm wide, 0.6–1.5 µm long), appearing like “fine sand” under microscopy, arranged single or sometimes in short chain’s due to their coccobacillus shape.
  • They are non-motile but possess flagellar gene’s, which is an oddity because those genes are observed but not utilized effectively, resulting in a sort of pseudo-motility potential.
  • Their cell-envelope is three-layered consisting of proteins, phospholipids,and LPS, producing unique smooth/rough colony types that stain differently (smooth colony’s raised, translucent; rough strains stain red/violet etc.).
  • The genome have two circular chromosome’s (~3.29 Mb total), with Chromosome I (≈2.11 Mb) carrying mostly metabolic gene’s, while Chromosome II (≈1.18 Mb) include’s pathogenicity-related elements.
  • G+C content remains nearly identical between chromosome’s (57.2 % and 57.3%), showing genomic uniformity that is recognized as being typical for this genus.
  • They lack plasmid’s and endospore’s, however—classical virulence factor’s like exotoxins or cytolysins also absent, which makes pathogenicity linked instead with alternative mechanism’s.
  • Brucella cells are facultatively intracellular, and survive mostly inside macrophage’s/dendritic cells, an adaptation that evade’s immune clearance and, in many situations, can cause persistent infection.
  • The intracellular life-cycle involve’s sequential BCV stages (eBCV → rBCV → aBCV), during which the bacteria is converted into a replication-permissive state, thereby producing chronic infection cycles.
  • Virulence is attributed to elements like the T4SS (VirB), the smooth LPS O-chain, urease enzyme, and erythritol usage, each of them playing a vital role in immune evasion or tissue tropism.
  • They survive in extreme conditions of temperature,pH and humidity, and can persist in frozen or aborted material’s, giving a look into their strong environmental endurance.
  • Host-specificity is present but flexible; species like bold B. melitensis (most virulent), bold B. abortus, bold B. suis, and bold B. canis infect different animals, and transmission dose in human’s is extremely low (10–100 organism’s).
  • Brucella species survive well in aerosols; and because of this Brucella was weaponized historically, B. suis being the first agent in the U.S. program, demonstrating why they’re placed in WHO Risk Group 3.

Geographical Distribution of Brucellosis

Brucellosis’ distribution is considered globally widespread, and also the disease is recorded in many regions where under-reporting occurs, which leads to an unclear true burden.

Asia shows the highest Human load, and this region is observed to be expanding in to new territories, resulting in rising case’s across Western Asia/Middle East.

Syria,Turkey,Iraq,Saudi Arabia, Oman and even Algeria report persistent endemicity, and incidence is fluctuating, however—it is usually interpreted as high.

In Iran the infection is recorded across most Provinces, which is considered to be a typical pattern for livestock-linked Zoonosis’s.

Jordan’s burden exceeds the levels seen in Europe/ North America, and also the overall region is linked to B. melitensis circulation.

Central Asia is recognized as being a high-incidence area, and nations like Kyrgyzstan or Tajikistan show various outbreaks, At the same time Kazakhstan’s incidence decreased after obligatory vaccination, producing a downward trend.

China and Mongolia hold major incidence; the Northern belts of China, like Inner Mongolia, were observed to generate >95% of national cases, this expansion shifted gradually toward southern areas.

Mongolia remains second globally in incidence, and the pattern is described as geographically persistent.

Southern Asia (e.g., India,Nepal,Afghanistan) is considered endemic, and rural India’s seroprevalence around 15.1 % is monitored as a significant Public Health signal.

Africa’s distribution is widespread, however surveillance is weak, causing gaps in the geographical mapping of cases.

North Africa shows endemicity, Algeria’s incidence around 27.1/100,000 (2018) is recorded, and Egypt’s hotspots lie in Delta and Upper-Egypt around the Nile River.

Nile Basin countries like Egypt,Sudan,Ethiopia and Tanzania present high endemic levels, which is believed to be linked to livestock mixing.

East Africa (Kenya,Tanzania) reports high seropositivity; Kenya’s incidence of 293.10/100,000 in 2019 was recorded, giving a look into sudden epidemiologic shifts.

Latin America presents most cases in the Americas: Mexico remains a hotspot, Peru,Argentina,Brazil also generate continuous case’s.

United States shows sporadic Human infection, mostly from unpasteurized Mexican-style cheese—this is observed in California, where imported dairy is associated with outbreaks.

Regions with eradication involve US/Canada/Western-Northern Europe, where domestic Brucella species are removed; however wildlife reservoirs (bison, elk) maintain infection in the Greater Yellowstone Area–producing ongoing risk.

Countries like Australia,New Zealand,Denmark,Finland,Norway,UK etc. were recognized as having Brucellosis-free livestock status, although B. ovis persists in New Zealand sheep.

EU rates are low (≈0.09/100,000, 2017–2018), and Malta eliminated disease after 2005 by pasteurization enforcement, which is regarded as being very effective.

Oceania is mostly free, but Australia records B. suis in pigs/ feral pig’s, and this is linked to human cases, forming occasional spillover.

Re-emergence occurs in Southern/Central Europe (Greece,Albania,North Macedonia,Italy,Spain,Portugal), Bosnia & Herzegovina regained infection after being free 1980–2000.

Israel and Palestine report sharp increases; this pattern is associated with cross-border livestock movements.

Global prevalence is strongly connected with B. melitensis, B. abortus, and B. suis, and their Eco – distribution determines regional risk, although newer species in Marine Mammals were detected too.

International travel and commercial livestock trade can influence disease expansion, and open-border movement of animals is suggested to be responsible for additional spread.

Habitat of Brucella

  • The Habitat’s core is described as being inside mammalian host’s, and also this cycle is considered intracellular in many situations, which leads to chronic colonization.
  • B. melitensis usually locates in goat’s and sheep, however it may be isolated from cattle, buffaloes, camels, dog’s, cat’s and even Nile catfish, producing a rather wide ecological reach.
  • B. abortus is known as cattle-linked species,and it persists in bison/elk; other host’s like horses or camels are recorded too, which is necessary for understanding reservoir expansion.
  • B. suis is associated with pigs, though several biovars inhabit hare, wild boar, reindeer or even rodent’s, resulting in different micro-niches across ecosystems.
  • B. canis is found in dogs and this microhabitat is recognized as being stable in domestic settings.
  • B. ovis occupies sheep populations, and this distribution is preserved across flock’s in various regions.
  • B. neotomae infects desert woodrats, And the species is believed to have been adapted to arid Rodent ecology.
  • B. microti is detected in Microtus voles and also in wild boar/foxes, showing inconsistent Host patterns.
  • Marine species like B. ceti and B. pinnipedialis inhabit whales,dolphins,porpoises or seal’s, forming an uncommon aquatic Habitat.
  • Additional species like B. papionis in baboons and B. vulpis in red-fox mandibular nodes are observed, however B. inopinata appears in humans and Tropical frogs, giving a look into unexpected host jumps.
  • The widespread Presence of B. melitensis, B. abortus, B. suis in farm animals determines global prevalence, because these reservoirs are linked to intense livestock movement.
  • Inside host cells the bacterium survives in macrophages/dendritic cells, and this intracellular cycle is utilized across several stages, which leads to sequential Brucella-containing vacuoles (BCV) forming.
  • The eBCV stage is acidified; then rBCV emerges from the ER, allowing proliferation, And after that the aBCV structure develops, resulting in bacterial exit.
  • Joint tissues, synoviocytes or osteoarticular spaces can be colonized, producing chronic pathology, in short, the organism likes these enclosed compartments.
  • Brucella persists in spleen,liver,lymph-nodes and bone-marrow, and reproductive organs show specific tropism because of trophoblast preference.
  • Female animals demonstrate colonization of placenta,uterine lining,mammary gland’s or supra-mammary nodes, which is required for vertical spread.
  • Male animals carry bacteria in testicles,epididymides,seminal vesicles etc., and the infection is often monitored in breeding stock.
  • In the Environment, Brucella survives extremes of temperature or pH, and also it endures humidity variations, producing a long external persistence.
  • The cells remain viable in feces,dead-organ tissues,frozen material’s or aborted tissue’s, however the survival in aerosol’s is particularly concerning, leading to airborne exposure.
  • Water,soil,dairy-products / meat were observed to harbor the pathogen, and this external reservoir is linked to animal shedding in milk, urine or reproductive secretion’s.

Classification of Brucella

  • Domain: Bacteria
  • Phylum: Proteobacteria
  • Class: Alphaproteobacteria
  • Order: Rhizobiales
  • Family: Brucellaceae
  • Genus: Brucella

Species:

  • B. melitensis – Sheep, goats, humans
  • B. abortus – Cattle, buffalo, humans
  • B. suis – Swine, humans
  • B. canis – Dogs, foxes, coyotes, humans
  • B. ovis – Rams
  • B. neotomae – Desert wood rats
  • B. ceti – Dolphins, porpoises
  • B. pinnipedialis – Seals, sea lions
  • B. microti – Field voles
  • B. inopinata – Humans (rare)
  • B. anthropi – Humans (formerly Ochrobactrum anthropi)
  • B. vulpis – Foxes

The genus Brucella comprises both classical and novel species, with some formerly classified under the genus Ochrobactrum now included based on genetic analyses.

Morphology of Brucella

  • The genus Brucella is recognized as being small Gram-negative coccobacilli, and also the cells’ shape appears like short rods, resulting in a compact morphology.
  • Their size usually ranges around 0.5–0.7 µm width and 0.6–1.5 µm length, although these number’s are observed to shift slightly during stressful situations.
  • Under microscopy the organism’s sometimes look like “fine sand”, And they occur singly, in pairs or in tiny clusters, which is considered to be typical for these coccobacilli.
  • They stain Gram-negative, however the envelope thickness gives a look into their resilience, producing three-layered structures with protein/phospholipid/LPS composition.
  • The cells are facultatively intracellular, meaning replication is carried inside host phagocytes, which can influence their small rounded appearance.
  • Motility isn’t expressed, but genes for a Flagellum are present in the genome, leading to an odd situation where the machinery is there yet chemotaxis is absent.
  • Most species are non-encapsulated,non-spore forming, non-pigmented etc., although minor irregularities are recorded in some isolates.
  • Smooth and rough colony forms occur, and the S-form produce raised circular convex translucent colony’s, while the R-form stains red/violet, which is necessary for diagnostic distinction.
  • Smooth strains contain an O-polysaccharide portion in LPS, resulting in serodiagnostic usefulness, whereas B. ovis and B. canis show rough phenotype’s.
  • Colony surface is often honey-colored, though growth is slow, and in many situations CO₂ is required for initial isolation, producing a slightly capricious laboratory profile.
  • Unipolar growth is demonstrated, like in Agrobacterium / Sinorhizobium species, and this pattern is monitored because it affects cell-cycle progression.
  • Replication occurs in a Brucella-containing vacuole (BCV), and the rBCV derived from the ER allows intracellular proliferation, which leads to distinctive morphological compactness.
  • Genomically the species show two circular chromosome’s, with the larger one linked to metabolism, and the smaller hosting pathogenicity gene sets, though spacing around those genes may be inconsistent.
  • DNA homology around ≈97 % is reported, and core markers like IS711 or bcsp31 are preserved, which is interpreted as being a sign of close evolutionary relation.
  • The cells’ morphology is maintained even in environmental phases, but minor dimension shifts can occur due to CO₂ changes, humidity or pH fluctuations.

Human Infections Caused by Brucella Species

  • Human brucellosis is considered a widespread Zoonotic illness, and also the infection is produced mainly by several Brucella species, resulting in chronic intracellular disease.
  • B. melitensis is the most Virulent for humans, and cases may reach 90–99 % in some region’s, which is regarded as being highly invasive.
  • B. suis from pigs (biovars 1–4) can infect humans, and aerosol exposure is observed to be risky, producing concerns for Bio-weaponization.
  • B. abortus typically linked to cattle shows lower virulence, however infection’s still occur due to livestock exposure.
  • B. canis is associated with dogs, and it may cause mild to moderate human infection, although diagnostic detection is sometimes inconsistent.
  • Other species like B. ceti, B. neotomae, B. inopinata were isolated from humans, leading to ambiguous transmission route’s.
  • Minimal infectious dose is low (≈10–100 organisms), and this low threshold is considered to be critical for Public Health risk.
  • Human disease progresses in acute → chronic phases, And the intracellular lifestyle is utilized to persist inside phagocytes.
  • Traditional names for the disease include “Malta fever”, “Undulant fever”, “Mediterranean fever”, etc. , which gives a look into historical clinical patterns.
  • Symptom onset usually appears after 2–4 weeks, and the vague clinical picture is linked to misdiagnosis or underreporting.
  • Fever is the most common sign; undulating temperature from 37.8°C to 40.8°C was reported, resulting in classical “wave-like” pattern.
  • Profuse sweating (night sweats) often smell’s like wet-hay, and this sign is often mentioned in clinical experience.
  • Musculoskeletal pain (arthralgia,myalgia,back-pain) is observed in >80 %, which is necessary for clinical suspicion.
  • General symptoms like fatigue, headache, malaise,anorexia occur, however these symptoms overlap with many other febrile illness’s.
  • Osteoarticular complications appear in 20–60 %, including peripheral arthritis, sacroiliitis, spondylitis, and osteomyelitis, and B. abortus is known to be damaging bone matrix.
  • Cardiovascular involvement is rare (~2 %), but endocarditis is the major mortality factor; valve replacement may be needed in certain cases.
  • Genitourinary involvement occurs up to 20 %, and orchitis or epididymitis are the commonest findings in men, producing swelling and pain.
  • Neurobrucellosis may appear as meningitis, encephalitis or even depression/fatigue, and this is considered to be a severe focal complication.
  • Gastrointestinal involvement appears in ~70 %, including hepatomegaly (≈46.67 %), splenomegaly (≈48.33 %), hepatitis (≈61.67 %), or liver abscesses (often linked to B. suis).
  • Pregnancy complications include abortion (especially 1st–2nd trimester), and congenital brucellosis can occur, leading to premature birth or neonatal risk’s.
  • Additional systems affected include respiratory tract (pneumonia,bronchitis), hematologic abnormalities (anemia,thrombocytopenia) or cutaneous lesion’s.
  • Transmission to humans mainly occurs by ingestion of contaminated dairy (unpasteurized milk, cheese), And this pathway is recognized as being dominant for the general population.
  • Direct contact with infected animal fluids (blood,urine,reproductive secretions,aborted materials) affects occupational groups like farmers or slaughterhouse-workers.
  • Aerosol inhalation is highly infective, especially in labs, resulting in laboratory-acquired brucellosis, which is the most common Lab-transmitted bacterial infection.
  • Lab exposure arises from sniffing cultures,mouth-pipetting, or accidental inoculation; this happens because the organism is not suspected until cultures become positive.
  • Human-to-human transmission is exceedingly rare, although it may occur via sexual contact, breastfeeding, blood transfusion’s or bone-marrow transplant’s.

Culture Media for Brucella

  • Brucella Agar
    • Contains peptones, dextrose, and yeast extract.
    • Supports growth of fastidious microorganisms.
  • Farrell’s Medium
    • Selective medium prepared by adding antibiotics to serum dextrose agar.
    • Inhibits growth of most contaminants, favoring Brucella species.
  • Brucella Blood Agar (BRU)
    • Enriched medium containing casein, peptones, yeast extract, and dextrose.
    • Supports growth of fastidious microorganisms.
  • Trypticase Soy Agar with 5% Blood
    • General-purpose medium supporting growth of Brucella species.
  • Chocolate Agar
    • Prepared by lysing red blood cells, releasing intracellular nutrients.
    • Supports growth of fastidious organisms.
  • MacConkey Agar
    • Differential medium for gram-negative bacteria.
    • Brucella species typically show poor or no growth.

Biochemical Test of Brucella melitensis

  • Gram Stain
    • Gram-negative coccobacilli.
  • Motility
    • Non-motile.
  • Spore Formation
    • Absent.
  • Capsule
    • Absent.
  • Oxidase
    • Positive.
  • Catalase
    • Positive.
  • Urease
    • Positive; hydrolysis detectable within 2 hours.
  • H₂S Production
    • Negative.
  • Dye Sensitivity
    • Growth on thionin 0.002%: Positive.
    • Growth on thionin 0.004%: Negative.
    • Growth on basic fuchsin 0.002%: Positive.
    • Growth on basic fuchsin 0.004%: Negative.
  • CO₂ Requirement
    • Non-requiring.
  • Phage Sensitivity
    • Not destroyed by Tbilisi phage.
  • Growth on Media
    • Growth on Brucella agar within 48 hours at 37°C.
  • Colony Morphology
    • Smooth, glistening, and pin-point colonies.
  • Gram Staining of Colonies
    • Small, gram-negative coccobacilli.
  • Biochemical Misidentification
    • May be misidentified as Moraxella phenylpyruvica in API 20NE system.

Differential Features of Brucella Species

SpeciesNatural HostsUreaseH₂S ProductionDye SensitivityPhage SensitivityCO₂ RequirementGrowth on MacConkey AgarColony Morphology
B. abortusCattle, buffaloesPositiveNegativeSensitive to thionin and basic fuchsinLysis by Tbilisi phageNon-requiringPoor or no growthSmooth, glistening colonies
B. melitensisSheep, goats, camelsPositiveNegativeSensitive to thionin and basic fuchsinLysis by Tbilisi phageNon-requiringPoor or no growthSmooth, glistening colonies
B. suisPigs, wild boar, hares, reindeerPositiveNegativeSensitive to thionin and basic fuchsinLysis by Tbilisi phageNon-requiringPoor or no growthSmooth, glistening colonies
B. canisDogsPositiveNegativeSensitive to thionin and basic fuchsinLysis by Tbilisi phageNon-requiringPoor or no growthSmooth, glistening colonies
B. ovisSheepPositiveNegativeSensitive to thionin and basic fuchsinLysis by Tbilisi phageNon-requiringPoor or no growthSmooth, glistening colonies
B. neotomaeDesert woodratsPositiveNegativeSensitive to thionin and basic fuchsinLysis by Tbilisi phageNon-requiringPoor or no growthSmooth, glistening colonies
B. microtiVolesPositiveNegativeSensitive to thionin and basic fuchsinLysis by Tbilisi phageNon-requiringPoor or no growthSmooth, glistening colonies
B. pinnipedialisSeals, sea lions, walrusesPositiveNegativeSensitive to thionin and basic fuchsinLysis by Tbilisi phageNon-requiringPoor or no growthSmooth, glistening colonies
B. cetiDolphins, porpoisesPositiveNegativeSensitive to thionin and basic fuchsinLysis by Tbilisi phageNon-requiringPoor or no growthSmooth, glistening colonies
B. intermediaRarely in humansPositiveNegativeSensitive to thionin and basic fuchsinLysis by Tbilisi phageNon-requiringPoor or no growthSmooth, glistening colonies
B. anthropiRarely in humansPositiveNegativeSensitive to thionin and basic fuchsinLysis by Tbilisi phageNon-requiringPoor or no growthSmooth, glistening colonies

Biotypes and Phage Types of Brucella Species

  • Brucella abortus shows biovar’s 1–7 and 9, and also these variants are observed mainly in cattle/buffaloes/bison, which is considered important for field typing.
  • Biovar 3 of B. abortus is prevalent in Nigeria, producing a region-specific distribution.
  • Brucella melitensis carries biovars 1–3, and biovar-1 is regarded as being the most pathogenic to humans, often linked to goat’s or sheep.
  • Brucella suis demonstrates biovars 1–5, however biovar-2 infects wild-boar and hare in Europe, resulting in wildlife reservoir’s.
  • Biovar-5 of B. suis is rare, and located in rodent’s from Northern Caucasus / South-West Siberia, giving a look into localized circulation.
  • Brucella canis is considered a stable rough-mutant of B. suis biovar-1, and it cause’s canine brucellosis, which can affect kennels.
  • Tbilisi (Tb) phage is used for typing B. abortus and B. melitensis, and it was isolated in 1955.
  • Weybridge (Wb) phage also targets B. abortus / B. melitensis, producing useful discrimination in labs.
  • Firenze (Fi) phage is applied similarly, however its reaction-profile may vary in to strains with rough tendencies.
  • Berkeley-2 (Bk2) is utilized for typing classical smooth species, which is necessary for some epidemiologic studies.
  • Izatnagar-1 (Iz1) is used for rough Brucella strains, and these rough-forms respond differently to standard phage sets.
  • Rough-specific phages (R/C) are recorded to target R-type strains; also the simple R-phage is applied for similar purpose’s.

Cell Wall Components and Antigenic Structure of Brucella Species

  • The cell-wall of Brucella is Gram-negative, and also it consists of outer membrane, thin peptidoglycan, and inner membrane, which is considered to be fairly resistant due to smooth-LPS.
  • Smooth LPS in species like B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. suis provides stronger evasion from TLR4, And the rough-forms like B. ovis or B. canis have defective O-antigen’s.
  • Lipopolysaccharide contains lipid A, core-oligosaccharide, and an O-polysaccharide chain, resulting in a major Virulence-Determinant that allow these cells to survive intracellularly.
  • O-antigen completeness defines the S→R variation, and in many situations this variation is utilized in Serology.
  • Outer-membrane proteins (Omp1, Omp2a, Omp2b,Omp25,Omp31) assist adhesion/invasion, however mutation in Omp25 reduces virulence, producing attenuated strain’s.
  • Porins regulate small-molecule passage, and their selective gating is observed to influence nutrient uptake in to the periplasmic space.
  • Phosphatidylcholine is present unusually, and also this component mimic’s host membranes, giving a look into immune evasion.
  • The peptidoglycan layer is thin, contains DAP, and provides cell-shape support, although structural rigidity may shift under CO₂-enriched growth.
  • Cytoplasmic membrane holds phospholipid bilayer, electron-transport components and transport-protein’s, which is necessary for energy conservation.
  • Periplasmic space stores β-lactamase and other enzyme’s, and this compartment is believed to preserve virulence-linked factors.
  • Antigenic structure is dominated by OPS (O-polysaccharide), and smooth-strains demonstrate strong immunodominance used in agglutination-test’s.
  • A and M antigen ratios differentiate B. abortus (A>M) from B. melitensis (M>A), whereas B. suis shows intermediate proportion’s.
  • Rough LPS antigens in B. canis and B. ovis show weaker immunogenicity, however rough-specific agglutination is applied for detection.
  • Cytoplasmic antigens like superoxide-dismutase or heat-shock proteins trigger delayed-type hypersensitivity, producing cellular immune responses.
  • No true capsule is present; capsule-like polysaccharide is absent, although some isolates show superficial coating’s that do not classify as capsule.
  • Lipid-A is less endotoxic than in E.coli, and this reduced toxicity is linked to dampened inflammation, resulting in chronic-course infection’s.

Virulence Factors of Brucella Species

Smooth-type LPS in Brucella is considered major Virulence machinery, and also the full-length O-chain helps stealth entry through lipid-rafts, resulting in evasion of phagolysosomal fusion.

The O-polysaccharide suppresses host-cell apoptosis, And it prevents Immune detection, producing a chronic intracellular lifestyle.

Type-IV secretion System (VirB T4SS) inject’s effectors in to host cells, which is necessary for rBCV maturation and ER-linked replication.

VirB complex reprograms intracellular trafficking, however some strain’s show variable expression under acidic stress.

Two-component BvrR/BvrS system regulate’s OMP profiles and coordinates entry/survival, giving a look into membrane-level remodeling.

Cyclic β-1,2-glucans modulate osmotic Balance in the periplasmic-space, and their presence is required for BCV formation and intracellular persistence.

Phosphatidylcholine synthesis produce an eukaryotic-like membrane, and also this mimicry supports Brucella’s intracellular trafficking.

RNA-chaperone Hfq controls VirB-operon and BabR, resulting in stress-response tuning; sRNA’s also modulate intracellular survival.

Quorum-sensing regulator BlxR influence’s VirB + Flagellar genes, whereas flagellar proteins like FliK are implicated in Immune modulation.

Acid-stress systems and urease activity (nikA-mediated nickel uptake) buffer acidic phagosome, leading to increased survival during early infection.

Acid induction of VirB and DnaK is observed to be essential under phagosomal conditions, although some isolates respond differently.

Brucella lacks classical exotoxins, cytolysins, fimbriae or large plasmids; this “absence” itself is regarded as being a stealth-strategy.

Pathogenesis of Brucellosis

  • Entry of Brucella usually occur’s through ingestion of raw-milk, inhalation of aerosol’s, or small skin-abrasions, and also the organism penetrate’s mucous-membranes quite efficiently.
  • After contact, the cells are phagocytosed by macrophage’s,dendritic-cells or epithelial layers, which is considered to be the first intracellular event.
  • Uptake occurs via lipid-raft mediated endocytosis, however classical phagolysosomal fusion is avoided, producing early survival advantage.
  • Inside phagocytes, a Brucella-containing-vacuole (BCV) forms, And its trafficking move’s through early endosome’s without merging in to lysosomes.
  • VirB type IV secretion system inject’s effectors that reprogram intracellular trafficking, resulting in BCV–ER interaction.
  • The rBCV niche emerges from the ER, and Brucella replicate’s inside this altered compartment, which is necessary for long-term persistence.
  • Smooth-LPS reduce’s TLR signaling and inhibit apoptosis, although some strain’s modulate MHC presentation differently, giving a look into Immune subversion.
  • Infected macrophages disseminate bacteria to lymph-nodes, then bacteremia occur’s, however organ localization shift’s toward liver,spleen or bone-marrow rich in reticuloendothelial cells.
  • Prolonged infection leads to granuloma-formation, producing a chronic inflammatory focus that sometimes persist for month’s or even year’s.
  • Clinical symptoms appear due to inflammation and organ-damage: undulant fever,joint pain,fatigue or hepatosplenomegaly are commonly recorded.
  • Chronicity arise’s from intracellular persistence, and relapse may appear when latent foci reactivate, especially if therapy was insufficient.

Clinical Syndromes of Brucellosis

Brucella (B. abortus) life host cycle.
Brucella (B. abortus) life host cycle. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Brucella-B-abortus-life-host-cycle-After-host-infection-the-invading-Brucella_fig1_262608489 [accessed 21 Nov 2024]
  • Fever is the commonest sign, and also undulant or spiking-afternoon patterns are observed in ~80–90 % case’s, which is considered to be classical presentation.
  • Profuse sweating occur’s, sometimes with a foul or moldy-odor, And this symptom was described as giving a wet-hay smell.
  • Fatigue,malaise,anorexia and even weight-loss appear gradually, producing a chronic constitutional picture.
  • Headache with myalgia is recorded frequently, however severity varies between patient’s depending on Immune response.
  • Arthralgia/arthritis affects large joint’s, sacroiliitis or spondylitis; and around 50–80 % patients show these musculoskeletal complaint’s.
  • Hepatomegaly or splenomegaly manifest with abdominal-pain,nausea or dyspepsia, which is necessary for recognizing GI involvement.
  • Epididymo-orchitis in men is seen in ~10–20 %, causing swelling and pain of testicle’s, although some cases remain subclinical.
  • Endocarditis is rare, however it’s the most serious complication; mortality is usually attributed to cardiac-valve destruction.
  • Neurobrucellosis may arise as meningitis, encephalitis, radiculopathy or cranial-nerve palsy, and psychiatric signs (depression,confusion) also occur’s.
  • Genitourinary infection can include urinary-tract involvement or glomerulonephritis, resulting in cloudy urine or flank discomfort in certain situation’s.
  • Hematologic abnormalities like anemia,leukopenia or thrombocytopenia are occasionally recorded, although mechanisms remain partially unclear.
  • Cutaneous or pulmonary involvement is uncommon, but pneumonia or skin-lesion’s can still present, leading to diagnostic misleading.
  • Overall the disease behaves like a multi-system disorder with recurring fever and systemic sign’s, however focal complications in joints,heart,nervous and GU-systems dominate clinical concern.

Reservoir, and Source of Brucellosis

Transmission of brucellosis.
Transmission of brucellosis.
  • Livestock serve as principal Reservoir’s, and also cattle hold B. abortus, goats/sheep maintain B. melitensis, while pigs carry B. suis, resulting in a sustained Zoonotic cycle.
  • Dogs infected with B. canis act as domestic reservoirs, however wild-rodents like those hosting B. neotomae or B. microti contribute to environmental persistence.
  • Sheep infected by B. ovis create additional flock-level circulation, And these reservoir’s complicate eradication.
  • Marine mammals, including whales or seal’s, harbor B. ceti and B. pinnipedialis, which is considered an unusual aquatic reservoir, producing occasional spillover.
  • Wildlife like bison, elk,deer and wild-boar maintain B. abortus in free-ranging populations, allowing back-spill in to livestock herds.
  • Human infection sources include unpasteurized dairy (milk, cheese) from infected herds, which is necessary for understanding community outbreaks.
  • Raw or undercooked meat from livestock/wildlife is recorded as another source, although risk varies with preparation practices.
  • Direct-contact with infected tissues—placenta,fetus or genital-secretions—cause’s occupational exposure, especially during farming or slaughtering.
  • Transmission occurs via ingestion of contaminated food/drink, however inhalation of aerosol’s in labs or abattoirs frequently produce high-risk scenario’s.
  • Skin-abrasion or mucosal inoculation is another pathway, and less-common routes include conjunctival contact,transfusion or rare sexual-transmission.
  • Occupational risk groups include farmers,veterinarians,slaughterhouse staff and laboratory-workers, And these individuals experience repeated exposure cycles.
  • Hunters or consumers of game-meat face risk when wildlife carry Brucella, producing infections linked to field-dressing or handling.
  • Wildlife dynamics show wild-bison/elk/deer maintaining B. abortus, whereas marine species transmit B. ceti via reproductive fluids or vertical passage, which gives a look into ecological complexity.
  • Overall brucellosis is maintained in animal reservoirs, and human cases arise through ingestion,inhalation or direct-contact with infected products/tissues.

Brucellosis Transmission Process to Humans

  • Transmission begin’s in animal reservoir’s where B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. suis or B. canis persist in cattle,goats,sheep,pigs and dogs, and also wildlife like bison or elk maintain long-term circulation.
  • Infected animals shed bacteria in milk, uterine or placental tissue’s,fetal-fluids, urine and genital-secretion’s, which is considered heavy during birthing/abortion events.
  • Contamination arise’s when these fluids reach raw-milk,dairy or farm-environments, And slaughterhouse floors become loaded with organism’s.
  • Human ingestion of unpasteurized milk,cheese or raw/undercooked meat including game is the most common exposure-pathway, producing steady Community-acquired cases.
  • Inhalation of contaminated aerosol’s (dust,birthing-fluids,lab cultures) cause’s infection, however even low-dose exposure (≈10–100 organisms) is highly efficient.
  • Direct inoculation through skin-abrasions or mucous-membrane contact (eyes,nose,mouth) occur’s in farmers, veterinarians or slaughterhouse-workers handling infected tissue’s.
  • Human-to-human spread is rare, although transplacental transfer, breastfeeding, sexual-contact, transfusion or organ-transplantation have been reported, giving a look into unusual routes.
  • After entry Brucella is engulfed by phagocyte’s, and intracellular survival is utilized to prevent degradation, which allow dissemination in to lymphatic/reticuloendothelial systems.
  • Bacteremia follow’s as bacteria enter bloodstream, and localization in spleen,liver,bone-marrow,lymph-nodes or reproductive-organ’s becomes typical.
  • Clinical disease then presents with undulant-fever,night-sweat’s,fatigue,arthralgia or hepatosplenomegaly; focal-complication’s like arthritis,endocarditis or neurobrucellosis may also develop.
  • Overall the transmission path moves reservoir → shedding → contamination → human-ingestion/inhalation/contact → intracellular persistence → systemic spread, however tiny deviations appear depending on host and environment.

Laboratory Diagnosis of Brucellosis

  • Diagnosis rely’s heavily on Lab findings because clinical picture is vague, And also Brucella’s intracellular habit complicate’s recognition.
  • Blood is usually preferred specimen for culture or serology, however bone-marrow provides higher sensitivity, producing positive result’s even when blood-culture is negative.
  • Additional samples—synovial-fluid,pleural-fluid,liver or lymph-node biopsies,CSF,urine,sputum, breast-milk or genital secretion’s—may be collected in certain situation’s.
  • Direct microscopy is limited; Gram-stain rarely reveal’s the tiny intracellular coccobacilli, which is considered diagnostically unhelpful.
  • Culture remains the definitive method, although growth is slow, requiring incubation at 37 °C with 5–10 % CO₂ in broth media like serum-dextrose or trypticase-soy.
  • Cultures must be sub-cultured after ~4 days, then checked every 3–5 days for up to 8-weeks, producing long waiting-times in practice.
  • Bone-marrow cultures are more sensitive than blood; synovial-fluid cultures yield positivity in around half of cases.
  • Identification is based on colony-morphology, Gram-stain, and biochemical-profile, and anti-brucella sera further confirm isolate identity.
  • Serology is key for subclinical, acute or chronic cases; IgM appears by 7–10 days and persist’s ≈3-months, whereas IgG/IgA emerge later and persist for year’s.
  • A four-fold rise in antibodies or a single high-titer (≥1:160) suggest’s brucellosis, which is necessary for clinical confirmation.
  • B. abortus antigen is used widely because it cross-react’s with B. melitensis and B. suis, while B. canis requires species-specific antigen.
  • Standard Tube Agglutination Test (STA) detects antibodies to LPS; titer of 1:160 or ≥4-fold rise is typical positive criterion.
  • STA is helpful for B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. suis, however not reliable for B. canis, which need’s separate tests.
  • Modified Tube Agglutination Test (MTAT) uses 2-mercaptoethanol to remove IgM, allowing detection of IgG, especially valuable during relapse or convalescence.
  • Indirect-immunofluorescent assay detect’s antibodies even when STA is negative, which gives a look into improved sensitivity.
  • ELISA is considered the most sensitive, detecting IgM,IgA,IgG in acute or chronic-phase, and CSF-ELISA support’s diagnosis of neurobrucellosis.
  • Serology challenges include blocking-antibodies giving false-positives; they are minimized by heating serum or using Coombs’/saline diluent.
  • Prozone phenomenon can mask agglutination, producing false-negative’s; dilution of serum eliminate’s this issue.
  • Cross-reactivity occurs with Vibrio cholerae, Yersinia enterocolitica, Francisella tularensis, Salmonella, which is necessary to consider in endemic settings.
  • Cholera-induced antibodies can be absorbed to reduce cross-reaction’s, although interpretation remain’s occasionally difficult.
  • Brucella skin-test uses brucellin extract, producing DTH reaction ≥6 mm within 24 h; positive only in chronic-phase, negative in acute-phase.
  • Bone-marrow exam may reveal erythrophagocytosis, giving additional supportive evidence.
  • CSF in neurobrucellosis show’s pleocytosis, raised-protein and low-glucose (hypoglycorrhea).
  • Common hematologic findings include anemia,thrombocytopenia or pancytopenia.
  • Animal-diagnosis mirror’s human approach, although milk/urine testing is often used for herd-screening.
  • Rapid tests like latex-agglutination or Rose-Bengal card test help identify infected cattle quickly, especially in field-conditions.
  • Milk-Ring Test mixes B. abortus or B. melitensis antigen with milk; blue-ring at surface indicate’s antibody-binding and thus infection.

Treatment of Brucellosis

  • First-line therapy generally combine’s doxycycline 100 mg twice-daily for 45-days with streptomycin 1 g IM for 14-days, and also this dual-regimen reduce’s relapse and improve’s efficacy.
  • Gentamicin 5 mg/kg IM daily for 7-days can substitute streptomycin, although local practice varies depending on drug-availability.
  • Adding rifampin is useful in certain cases, especially Neuro-brucellosis, which is considered difficult to eradicate.
  • Monotherapy with doxycycline alone is not recommended for acute or chronic forms, because relapse-risk becomes pronounced.
  • Triple-therapy (doxycycline + rifampin + co-trimoxazole) is widely used in Neuro-brucellosis, providing broader intracellular coverage.
  • Chronic or complicated disease usually receive doxycycline + rifampin for 45-days, however gentamicin may be added for first 5-days in some regimen’s.
  • Endocarditis requires aggressive therapy: doxycycline + rifampin + trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for ≥4-weeks, followed by additional 8–12-weeks of at least 2–3 active-agents, excluding aminoglycosides.
  • Surgical intervention might be necessary when abscesses or resistant-lesion’s persist, giving a look into challenging management.
  • Pregnant individuals receive rifampin 15–20 mg/kg/day (max 600–900 mg/day) for 6-weeks, although fetal-risk cannot be fully excluded.
  • Pediatric management avoid’s doxycycline in <8-years; preferred regimen uses rifampin + cotrimoxazole for ~45-days.
  • Alternative pediatric approach: rifampin 45-days with gentamicin 5–6 mg/kg/day for first 5-days, producing effective bactericidal response.
  • Supportive-care include’s antipyretics/analgesics; corticosteroid-use for meningitis remain’s controversial, as evidence is not conclusive.
  • Relapse is minimized by combination-therapy, however recurrence still appears in ≈5–10 %, especially if Neuro-brucellosis or Endocarditis is present.
  • Persistent cases may need prolonged or repeated antibiotic-courses, although dosing-strategies vary among clinician’s.
  • Typical treatment-duration for uncomplicated disease is ~6-weeks; complicated cases require extended therapy based on organ-involvement.
  • Monitoring involve’s liver-function testing, CBC, and occasional follow-up cultures to confirm eradication.
  • Serologic-testing help’s track therapeutic response and detect relapse, which is necessary for long-term follow-up.
  • Adherence to full therapy course is crucial; patients should be educated to continue medication even when symptoms improve prematurely.
  • Neuro-brucellosis often rely’s on triple-therapy, whereas Endocarditis typically employs doxycycline + rifampin + TMP-SMX with possible cardiac-surgery.
  • Fluoroquinolones have been tested in some studies, but routine-use is discouraged due to resistance or reduced-effectiveness.
  • No specific adjunctive therapy is proven to enhance antibiotic efficacy; supportive-management remain’s essential.
  • No effective human-vaccine exist’s, although livestock-vaccines (e.g., B. abortus strain-19) help control outbreaks at herd-level.
  • Public-health practice emphasizes avoiding unpasteurized dairy or undercooked meat, and implementing livestock control-measures like vaccination/culling.
  • Occupational-safety for farmers,laboratory-workers and veterinarians reduce’s risk of exposure to Brucella spp.

Prevention and Control of Brucellosis

  • Vaccination of livestock is central, and also cattle receive B. abortus strain-19 or RB51, whereas goats/sheep are immunized using B. melitensis Rev-1, producing herd-level protection.
  • Pigs receive B. suis strain-2, and B. canis RB51 is used for dogs; sheep infected by B. ovis require dedicated flock-program’s, although no human-vaccine exist’s.
  • WHO recommend’s vaccination particularly in enzootic-areas with high-prevalence, which is considered necessary for reducing transmission in to humans.
  • Surveillance rely’s on routine serology in livestock, and culling of infected animal’s is implemented to halt spread, although decision-making may vary between region’s.
  • Movement-control and quarantine of affected herds prevent’s pathogen dispersal, producing gradual decline in new cases.
  • Pasteurization of dairy—heating milk to ≈70 °C for 2–3-seconds—eliminate’s Brucella, however improper-heating can leave residual organism’s.
  • All dairy-products intended for consumption should be pasteurized, and WHO highlight’s this step as most effective for Food-safety.
  • Food-safety practice include’s avoiding raw/undercooked meat, especially game-meat; proper cooking to safe internal temperatures reduce’s risk substantially.
  • Safe handling of tissues during butchering/processing is essential, And also hunters face risk when dressing wild-animals.
  • Occupational-safety require’s PPE (gloves,masks,goggles) for farmers,veterinarians or slaughterhouse-workers, which is necessary to reduce direct-contact exposure.
  • Laboratories working with Brucella spp. must implement biosafety-protocols, and post-exposure prophylaxis using doxycycline + rifampin may be offered after significant exposure.
  • Public-awareness campaigns should educate communities on risk’s of unpasteurized dairy, hygiene practice’s, and the importance of livestock-vaccination.
  • Community outreach facilitate’s safer Food-handling, And participation in regional control-program’s increase’s when awareness is raised.
  • A One-Health strategy integrates human,animal and environmental sectors, resulting in coordinated interventions across disciplines.
  • Cross-sector collaboration among Public-Health, Veterinary and Environmental agencies improve’s surveillance and ensures more efficient management.
  • Collectively these measures reduce incidence in both humans and animals, although effectiveness depend’s on adherence, regional-resources and sustained engagement.
Reference
  1. Alton GG, Forsyth JRL. Brucella. In: Baron S, editor. Medical Microbiology. 4th edition. Galveston (TX): University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996. Chapter 28. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8572/
  2. Carvalho TPD,Silva LAD, Castanheira TLL,Souza TDD, Paixão TAD, Lazaro-Anton L, Tsolis RM, Santos RL,2023.Cell and Tissue Tropism of Brucella spp.. Infect Immun91:e00062-23.https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00062-23
  3. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/213430-overview
  4. https://www.woah.org/en/disease/brucellosis/
  5. https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/brucellosis-symptoms-treatment
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/brucella
  7. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/000597.htm
  8. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/infectious-diseases/gram-negative-bacilli/brucellosis
  9. https://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/pdf/brucellosi-reference-guide.pdf
  10. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/brucellosis/symptoms-causes/syc-20351738
  11. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/17886-brucellosis
  12. https://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/about/index.html
  13. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/brucellosis
  14. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/213430-overview
  15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brucella

Start Asking Questions

Supports Markdown:**bold**, *italic*, ~~strikethrough~~, `code`

Ad Blocker Detected
We've detected that you're using an ad blocker. Some content may not display properly.
Why are you seeing this? Ad blockers can prevent certain content and features from loading correctly on our website.

To continue with the best experience: